Do you ever read a book and feel like you need a long, hot shower when you're done? That is how I felt after finishing the original French version of this book. Dubois tries to make the case that Fulcanelli didn't really exist, that he was a "committee". The point of such an argument is to destroy the reality of the adept and give the credit for his work to Schwaller. Dubois takes great pleasure in the character assassinations of Jean-Julien Champagne and Eug?ne Canseliet.
Moreover the book is poorly written and goes off on tangents that have nothing to do with her "argument".
If you can read French, you will learn much more about the man known as Fulcanelli reading Patrick Rivi?re's book Fulcanelli in the Qui suis-je? series published by Pard?s.
I haven't read this book yet, but i know i'll be satisfied with what lies within! I shall hope any person in their open mind would appreciate such a topic, on Fulcanelli, what could be more intriging?
